An excerpt from my forthcoming book, "#MeNeither: The Nobility of Man Amidst the Feminist Mass Hysteria".
(Quote)
(Quote)
In the late 20th and early 21st centuries, the people of North America and Europe found themselves in the grip of an incredibly destructive phenomenon—the Feminist mass hysteria. A philosophy or school of thought can only be judged on its major works—the books, essays, articles, and speeches of its founders and leaders. The Feminist mass hysteria was born of the ideas of a group of deeply disturbed Gay Women/Feminist self-described "activists" of the 1960’s and 70’s—women like Valerie Solanas, author of the "SCUM Manifesto" and convicted attempted murderer who shot an unarmed and unthreatening Andy Warhol in cold blood with a .38 revolver, destroying his health for the remainder of his life, and; Andrea Dworkin, author of “Intercourse” and “Pornography: Men Possessing Women”. It was Dworkin, in her effort to destroy “Second Wave Feminism” and the sexual liberation movement, who uttered the famous words:
“Yea, I’m a radical Feminist. Not the fun kind.”
I won't give much more publicity to the Radical/Lesbian Feminists of that era (except to use their own words to counter any of their objections or criticisms). Those people were and are filled with hate—that is their Raison d'être. Of course, there is no such thing as a "Feminist" or gay women for that matter. These are women who suffer from heterosexual dysphoria (not to be confused with heterosexual gender dysphoria)—they hate men and they find hetero-male sexuality repugnant and repulsive. But most of all, Feminists hate the product of men: Children. And they have been enormously effective in exerting influence from their power base within the Humanities/Social "Studies" (I would assert Indoctrination) Professoriate within the University/Industrial complex and in the Media.
But Feminism has a fatal flaw. Feminists themselves are human beings and as such are the product of the human sexual experience, an experience that is promulgated by the male. So Feminists must censor the role of the heterosexual male and his contribution in sustaining Mankind and insist that Life begins at birth.
Why do Feminists insist that Life begins at birth? The answer is that Feminists must deny that Life begins at conception. To say otherwise would be to acknowledge the male’s role in creating Life. While childbirth is the province of the female who can deny that conception is the province of the male? After all, It is the male’s active role of arousal, subsequent penile erection, and finally orgasm that delivers a path to the future of Humanity. If the future of Mankind depended on the passions and desires and contributions for raising children of Feminists/Lesbian Women then Mankind would vanish within a single generation.
Feminists’ war on the unborn begins with and is part and parcel of their war on, and hatred of, heterosexual men and the penile erection. This is the primary symptom of Feminist heterosexual dysphoria and their political/social strategy is to negate the male role in procreation altogether.
To a Feminist, only the "Sacred Female", can give Life! "Noble Man" has no part in the Creation of Life!
Feminism seeks to deny Man’s place in Creation and Life and assert that the miraculous odyssey of Man’s Life-Giving force is evil—and that all of the physiological and psychological responses that our Creator has given Man to ensure a path to the future for Mankind must be abjured. Shouted down. Papered over.
Feminists have coined their own political verb, “to objectify”, a term of derision directed at the Life-Giving force of passion and desire that a man has for a woman. It then follows that what Feminists are insisting on is that the manner in which Man achieves and maintains an erection—a phenomenon that has sustained Mankind by filling a woman with Life since the dawn of Mankind—must change. Feminists, that is people who have never had an erection, who have never filled a woman with Life, and who do not possess the will to sustain and provide for that Life and the life of the Mother at the most vulnerable time of their lives—the long period of human childhood dependence and the several years of maternal lactation—allege that they have a better way. If only Man will change to fit and meet their ideal. And they are going to scorch and salt the very earth and poison the water in the wells with their propaganda in an effort to accomplish their agenda.
Feminist theory seems to have taken a great deal of inspiration, rather than fear, away from the works of Aldus Huxley ("Brave New World") and George Orwell ("1984") and then fought, and fought hard, to remove these books from the public school curriculum. Even when they are not successful in this their proxies, in the form of public school teachers, step in to lend a hand. The public school teachers' union, NEA (National Education Association), and the Feminist organization NOW (National Organization for Women (and their war on men and children)) are as a practical matter, one and the same. These books are simply “must reads” for individuals who value their autonomy and liberty.
Of course, Feminism will eventually be crushed out of existence by the Life-giving force of man but not before murdering hundreds of millions of unborn children and imprisoning and impoverishing thousands of men who did not engage in coercion.
It must be noble Man, the men who will father children and protect and care for his offspring to project his seed into the future, a future that Humanity depends on, who puts a stop to this.
(unquote)
